#co_loginIFrame { width:100%; height: 20em; } @media (max-width: 575px) { #co_loginIFrame { height: 46em; } } @media (min-width: 576px) { #co_loginIFrame { height: 48em; } } @media (min-width: 768px) { #co_loginIFrame { height: 34em; } } @media (min-width: 992px) { #co_loginIFrame { height: 26em; } } window.addEventListener("message", (event) => { let tURL = "https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU21/session/38908"; if(event.origin.search(".copernicus.org")) { let data = event.data; } return; }, false);

Enter Zoom Webinar

SC2.13

Let's peer review

How do you peer-review? Apparently you are just supposed to miraculously know. Many of us never receive formal training in peer review, yet our peer-reviews are the cornerstone of scientific legitimacy. Constructive, respectful, coherent reviews nurture dialogue and advance research. So, how can we review papers in an efficient way? In this course, we suggest a process to help ensure that we give the authors the most useful feedback? We will hear from peer-review experts about how they go about the process and have an open discussion with the audience.

Share:

Convener: Mathew Stiller-Reeve | Co-convener: Bronwyn Wake

Activation of the text chat sets a cookie in your browser that is automatically deleted at the end of the conference.

A chat user is typing ...

SHIFT+ENTER for line break

A chat user is typing ...